Model radiation on 3D components
Model radiative heat transfer on 3D components and compare full radiation solution with the simplified approach and evaluate solve time trade-offs.
Introduction
Radiative heat transfer can significantly influence component temperatures in gas turbine engines, particularly where convection is weak or components with large temperature differences have a direct line of sight.
Radiation is typically important in regions such as:
- The exhaust assembly, where hot diffuser walls radiate to cooler outer casings
- The turbine inlet, where components are exposed to combustion gases
When deciding how to model radiation, consider:
- Can you represent components with 2D elements?
- Can you apply cyclic symmetry?
- Can you divide the model into multiple enclosures to reduce solve time?
- Can you accept reduced accuracy to achieve significantly faster solve times?
This tutorial compares two radiation modeling approaches:
- Full enclosure radiation with periodic radiation enabled.
- Simplified radiation using thermal couplings and precomputed gray-body view factors.
Load and inspect the model
Inspect components, identify radiating regions, and review boundary conditions.
Explore the radiation enclosure
Explore the defined radiation enclosure that uses the Monte Carlo view factor calculation method.
Explore Cyclic Symmetry
Explore periodic radiation in a cyclic symmetry model.
Explore Heat Map reports
Explore the Heat Map reports applied to several regions of interest for view factor calculations.
Inspect the view factor results
A full radiation enclosure solution requires hours to solve. Instead, use the supplied results.
Build the simplified radiation model
Replace the enclosure radiation with gray-body radiation thermal couplings.
Create Result Probes
Create a Result Probe to calculate the average nodal temperature of the strut region most affected by radiation.
Compare results
Create and overlay graphs for two solutions.

From these curves, the following conclusions are:
- The simplified radiation model predicts an average temperature within approximately 6 °C of the full radiation model at steady-state conditions.
- The close agreement between the full radiation model and the simplified model validates the use of gray body view factors and radiative conductances in the simplified approach.
Additional Notes
- Avoid excessive heat map reports to reduce solve time.
- Review solve times for two solutions.

















