Comparison between finite volume methods
The thermal solver supports two finite volume conduction methods—the center of element method and the element's center of gravity (CG) method—to create conductive conductances from geometry.
The center of element method directly creates conductances between element centers. The element CG method creates boundary elements on each element’s geometry and creates conductances between each element's CG and these boundary elements. This is the recommended method.
- Accuracy
- The element CG method generally yields a more accurate conductance matrix for solid elements compared to the center of element method.
- Tolerance
- Oddly shaped elements are better accommodated by the element CG method, enhancing its robustness.
- Density
- For regular rectangular meshes, the element CG method results in a denser mesh configuration.
- Surface temperature computation
- The element CG method calculates temperature at the CG of surface elements, providing a closer approximation of the average surface temperature for elements involved in radiation or convection. This leads to more precise temperature computations in models with irregularly shaped elements and significant radiation or convection effects.
- Negative conductances
- Unlike the center of element method, the element CG method can result in negative conductances under certain conditions.
- Material and element consistency
- Both methods handle orthotropic materials and axisymmetric elements consistently.